Local Government’s Tax Practices From A Cooperative Federalism Perspective

Authors

  • Raj Kumar Dhungana Kathmandu University, School of Education
  • Keshav Kumar Acharya GIZ- German Development Agency

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3126/nppr.v1i1.43440

Keywords:

federalism, fiscal governance, tax, revenue, local government, Nepal

Abstract

This study analyses intergovernmental revenue policies and its practices in Nepal, specifically focusing on the role of local governments (LGs) in tax administration. Both qualitative and quantitative data were used in this study that concluded LGs are gradually institutionalising internal revenue bases, and rates at the local level. The constitution 2015 has provisioned that the local governments can autonomously execute various functions including legislative, administrative, financial management, tax administration and so on. Nonetheless, imperfect experience, inadequate technical skills, limited legal and procedural grounds, and weak institutional capacity, LGs are collecting tax. Result shows tax enforcement process has been implemented with limited consultation with the taxpayers and minimal coordination with the provincial and federal government. This has created number of criticisms to the LGs about their unaccountability to the taxpaying citizens. Thus, some recommendations such as integration of technical management capacity with local, provincial, and federal level for efficient fiscal administration systems; and digitization and automation of taxation for intergovernmental cooperation have been provided for improving local economic and effective tax administration at the local level.

Author Biographies

Raj Kumar Dhungana, Kathmandu University, School of Education

Raj Kumar Dhungana is development professional with more than 2 decades of experiences in the bilateral, multilateral, government, and civil society organizations in good governance, education, peacebuilding, capacity development, and program management. He holds PhD from Kathmandu University. His research interests are on governance, peace and education. He is currently working in Royal Norwegian Embassy and teaching development policy and planning as a visiting faculty member of Kathmandu University.

Keshav Kumar Acharya, GIZ- German Development Agency

Keshav K. Acharya is Governance Advisor of Capacity Development Support to Governance Project of GIZ Nepal. His main interest areas are federalism, local governance, public policy, capacity development, regional/urban planning, service delivery, peacebuilding, community development, and disaster management. He holds PhD from the University of New England, Australia and MSc from the Asian Institute of technology of Thailand. Dr. Acharya as a development expert worked in different positions of multilateral and bilateral organisations for more than 20 years. Additionally, he has written some books, articles and research papers, which are published in peer-reviewed international journals and book chapters.

References

Acharya, K. K. (2014). Relevance of community governance for basic service delivery in Nepal: An empirical study (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Armadale, Australia: University of New.

Acharya, K.K. (2018). Local Governance Restructuring in Nepal: From Government to Governmentality. Dhaulagiri Journal of Sociology and Anthropology, 12, 37-49.

Acharya, K. K., and Zafarullah, H. (2020). Institutionalizing Federalism in Nepal: Operationalizing Obstacles, Procrastinated Progress, Public Administration and Policy, 1727-2645.

Acharya, K. R. (2017). An Economic Analysis of Government Revenue and Expenditure in Nepal, Tribhuvan University Journal, 31(1 & 2), 51-62.

ADB, (2009). Nepal: Critical Development Constraints, Philippines: Asian Development Bank.

Bolnick, B, and Singh, P. (2017). Domestic resource mobilization case study: Nepal leadership in public financial management II. USAID. https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PA00T4XQ.pdf

Birch, A. H. (1955). Federalism, Finance, and Social Legislation in Canada, Australia, and the United States. London: Oxford University Press,. 305.

Burgess, M. (2006). Comparative Federalism: Theory and practice, New York, Routledge.

Chandrika, A. and Acharya, K. K. (2020). Deconstructing Federalism through the lens of Federal Constitution of Nepal, Essays on Constitutional Law,Kathmandu, Nepal Law Society, 40, 90-117.

Devkota, K.M. (2021). BittyaSanghiyeta Ra Sthaniya Taha [Fiscal federalism and LG]. Kantipur National Daily, 11 April 2021. https://ekantipur.com/opin�- ion/2021/04/11/161810716277294092.html

Devkota, K.M. (2021b). Subnational level finances. The Kathmandu Post, 14 August, 2021. https://kathmandupost.com/columns/2021/03/28/subnational-level-finances

Fritz, C. (2017). An appraisal of selected tax-enforcement powers of the South African Revenue Service in the South African constitutional context (Doctoral dissertation, University of Pretoria).

GoN. (1999). Local Self Governance Act 1999, Kathmandu, Law Books Management Board,Nepal.

GoN. (2015). The Constitution of Nepal. Kathmandu. Nepal Law Commission.

GoN. (2017a). Intergovernmental fiscal transfer Act, 2017,Kathmandu,Law Commission of Nepal.

GoN. (2017b). LG Operation Act 2017,Kathmandu,Law Commission of Nepal.

GoN, (2017c). National Natural Resources Fiscal Commission Act, 2017, Kathmandu, Law Commission of Nepal.

GoN. (2020). Economic Survey 2019/20. Kathmandu: Ministry of Finance (MoF).

Kafle, M. P. (1987),.Decentralization Scheme in Nepal, In: S. B. Gurung&P. Roy (Eds.), Planning With People: Decentralization in Nepal (11-28), Delhi, Orient Longman.

Khanal, G. (2016). Fiscal Decentralization and Municipal Performance in Nepal. Journal of Management and Development Studies, 27, 59-87.

Martinez-Vazquez, J. and McNab, R., (2005). Fiscal Decentralization, Macrostability, and Growth, Georgia, Georgia State University.

Mason, R. (2011). Federalism and the Taxing Power, California Law Review, 975-103.

Peterson, R. A., (1995). Relationship Marketing and the Consumer, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(4), 278-281.

Shah, A., (2007). Introduction: Principles of Fiscal Federalism. In Shah, A., Kincaid, J. (Eds.), The Practice of Fiscal Federalism: Comparative Perspectives (pp. 3-42).

Shaha, S.K., (2020). SthaniyaTahakoRajshowAdhikar (LG’s Tax Rights). Prasasan, (https:// www.prasashan.com/2020/08/17/191536/ (7th April 2021).

Shrestha, R., (2019). Governance and Institutional Risks and Challenges in Nepal, Manila, Asian Development Bank.

Shrestha, A. and Vanik, J. (2019). Fiscal federalism in Nepal. Kathmandu: Sammridi Foundation.

Subedi, S. (2013): Fiscal decentralization and municipal taxation in Nepal. unpublished doctoral dissertation, Faculty of Humanities and Social Science, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal.

Ter-Minassian, T. (1997). Fiscal federalism in theory and practice. Washington: International Monetary Fund.

Thapa and Sharma (2011). The Democratic Deficit and Federalism in Nepal: Is it a Cure or Part of the Problem?, Lex Localis 9(1):39-66

Additional Files

Published

2021-09-18

How to Cite

Dhungana, R. K., & Acharya, K. K. (2021). Local Government’s Tax Practices From A Cooperative Federalism Perspective. Nepal Public Policy Review, 1, 157–178. https://doi.org/10.3126/nppr.v1i1.43440

Issue

Section

Regular Articles