Changing dynamics of the U.S.–Nepal policy: An analysis through the lens of hegemonic stability theory

Dron Prasad Lamichhane

doi:10.59552/nppr.v5i1.90

Authors

Dron Prasad Lamichhane Institute of Foreign Affairs (IFA), Kathmandu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59552/nppr.v5i1.90

Keywords:

Bilateral relations, foreign policy, Nepal, Nepal’s position, U.S.

Abstract

This study examines the evolving dynamics of U.S.–Nepal relations through the lens of Hegemonic Stability Theory (HST), focusing on the period from establishment of diplomatic ties to Biden administration. The objectives are to analyze U.S.–Nepal foreign policy initiatives, assess Nepal’s positioning within these policies, and apply HST to understand the interactions. Utilizing a descriptive-analytical approach to collect, descibe and analyse relevant data from academic sources and grey literature, the study highlights Nepal’s strategic importance amid shifting global and regional power dynamics. Findings indicate that U.S.–Nepal relations have been shaped by the U.S. goal of maintaining a balance between China and India, particularly during the Cold War. U.S. policy emphasized supporting Nepal’s sovereignty and democratic development in coordination with India to counter communist influence. Following the Cold War, U.S. engagement with Nepal increased, driven by regional dynamics and concerns, including the Maoist insurgency and War on Terror. As global power structures shifted from unipolarity to multipolarity, U.S. policy towards Nepal has remained unchanged in terms of development assistance through the USAID program and the recent Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) agreement. Although the U.S. has always consistently maintained that MCC is a bilateral development program, it has frequently been characterized in Nepal’s public discourse as a instrument of the Indo-Pacific Strategy. Despite deepening engagement, Nepal remains concerned that Indian perspectives are shaping U.S. policies towards Nepal. The study concludes by providing critical insights into U.S.–Nepal relations, suggesting that Nepal needs to redefine its foreign policy to engage more independently with the U.S., while balancing regional pressures and strengthening its institutional capacity to counter misinformation and check foreign influence over public discourse.

Author Biography

Dron Prasad Lamichhane, Institute of Foreign Affairs (IFA), Kathmandu

He holds an MPhil degree and is currently pursuing his PhD at the Department of International Relations and Diplomacy, Tribhuvan University. He is affiliated with the Institute of Foreign Affairs (IFA) in Kathmandu and has been serving as a lecturer at various colleges in Kathmandu. Additionally, he possesses experience in the media sector and has actively contributed writings on contemporary issues concerning domestic politics, international relations, foreign policy, and global affairs. His research interests encompass US-Nepal relations, US-Nepal policies, China-India factors, neighborhood policy, power transitions, and the implications of great power rivalries for Nepal.

References

Acharya, U. (2025). Mapping misinformation: An analysis of 10 prominent misinformation cases. In U. Acharya (Ed.), Nepal’s misinformation landscape (pp. 95-136). Center for Media Research – Nepal. https://research.butmedia.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/NML_Mapping_Misinformation_Ujjwal_Acharya.pdf#page=74

Adhikari, D. R. (2018). A small state between two major powers: Nepal’s foreign policy since 1816. Journal of International Affairs, 2(1), 43-74. https://doi.org/10.3126/joia.v2i1.22575

Adhikari, M. (2012). Renewed American engagement with Nepal’s Maoists [IDSA Issue Brief]. Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses. https://idsa.in/system/files/IB_RenewedAmericanEngagement.pdf

Adhikari, R. (2023). Geopolitics, misinformation, and foreign aid: The MCC Compact in Nepal. Journal of South Asian Studies, 41(2), 183–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/02666030.2023.2173501

Adhikari, S. (2024). Nepal’s portrayal of its international image. Unity Journal, 5(1), 191-206. https://doi.org/10.3126/unityj.v5i1.63186

Aryal, K. (2025). Assessing information landscape in Nepal through constructive approach. Molung Educational Frontier, 15, 205-220. https://doi.org/10.3126/mef.v15i01.74026

Baniya, D. B. (2023). The thriving strategy for Nepal amidst triangular competition of China, India, and the United States. Unity Journal, 4(01), 112-130. https://doi.org/10.3126/unityj.v4i01.52234

Bhandari, S. (2014). Self-determination & constitution making in Nepal: Constituent Assembly, inclusion &ethic federalism. Springer. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262611683_Self-Determination_Constitution_Making_in_Nepal

Bhattarai, K.D. (2022, May 25). U.S. engagement with Nepal’s Tibetan refugees infuriating China. Annapurna Express. https://theannapurnaexpress.com/story/25301/

Brown, M. (1971). The diplomatic development of Nepal. Asian Survey, 11(7), 661-676. https://doi.org/10.2307/2642973

Camp, D. (2005, March 16). U.S. policy in South Asia: Statement before the House International Relations Committee Subcommittee on Asia and the Pacific [Press statement]. https://2001-2009.state.gov/p/sca/rls/rm/2005/42910.htm

Central Tibetan Administration. (2020, December 28). US President Trump signs Tibetan Policy and Support bill; CTA is recognized and funding for Tibet provided. Tibet.net. https://tibet.net/us-president-trump-signs-tibetan-policy-and-support-bill-cta-recognized-and-funding-for-tibet-provided/

Dahal, D. R. (2011). The art of survival: Policy choices for Nepal. Dhaulagiri Journal of Sociology and Anthropology, 5, 31-48. https://doi.org/1/support dsaj.v5i0.6355

Department of Defense. (2019). Indo-Pacific strategy report: Preparedness, partnerships, and promoting a networked region. U.S. Department of Defense. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/AD1082324.pdf

Duncan, E. M. (1987). Chronology of relations between the United States and Nepal, 1947-87. Department of State Bulletin, 87, 63+. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A5278931/AONE?u=anon~78e15b79&sid=googleScholar&xid=5d0aad6e

Dutt, V. P. (2009). India’s foreign policy in a changing world. Vikas Publishing House. https://www.vikaspublishing.com/books/humanities-social-sciences/political-science/indias-foreign-policy-changing-world/9788125908449

Ghimire, B. (2019, June 13). Nepal government clears legal hurdles to buy lethal arms from the US. The Kathmandu Post. https://kathmandupost.com/national-security/2019/06/13/nepal-government-clears-legal-hurdles-to-buy-lethal-arms-from-the-us

Gilpin, R. (1981). War and change in world politics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511664267

Giri, A. (2023, March 3). Nepal votes in favour of UN resolution to deplore Russian invasion of Ukraine. The Kathmandu Post. https://kathmandupost.com/national/2022/03/03/nepal-votes-in-favour-of-un-resolution-to-deplore-russian-invasion-of-ukraine

Giri. A, & Ghimire. B. (2022, June 17). On SPP, no party looks clean— all lying, playing to the gallery. The Kathmandu Post. https://kathmandupost.com/national/2022/06/17/on-spp-no-party-looks-clean-all-lying-playing-to-the-gallery

Gyawali, P. (2022). Small states and strategic hedging: Nepal amid US–China rivalry. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 7(3), 295–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/20578911211060354

Habibullah, S. M. (2009). The role of the government. The Nepali Security Sector, 85-96.

Hachhethu, K. (2009). The Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist): Transformation from an insurgency group to a competitive political party. European Bulletin of Himalayan Research, 33(34), 39-71.

Hu, W. (2020). The United States, China, and the Indo-Pacific Strategy: The Rise and Return of Strategic Competition. China Review, 20(3), 127–142. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26928114

Human Rights Watch. (2008, July 24). Appeasing China: Restricting the rights of Tibetans in Nepal. Human Rights Watch. https://www.hrw.org/report/2008/07/24/appeasing-china/restricting-rights-tibetans-nepal

Ikenberry, G. J. (2001). After victory: Institutions, strategic restraint, and the rebuilding of order after major wars. Princeton University Press. https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691192840/after-vic

International Campaign for Tibet. (2020, February 11). New China–Nepal agreements could deny Tibetans freedom. International Campaign for Tibet. https://savetibet.org/new-china-nepal-agreements-could-deny-tibetans-freedom/

Jabeen, M. (2014). Indo-US relations in changing regional context of post-9/11 events. Journal of Contemporary Studies, 3(1), 18-37. https://jcs.ndu.edu.pk/site/issue/view/9 https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/62458111/2_Indo-US_Relations_in_

Kafle, S. (2022, June 27). What should Nepal learn from the SPP debacle? Nepal Live Today. https://www.nepallivetoday.com/2022/06/27/what-should-nepal-learn-from-the-spp-debacle/

Kaur, H. (2018). Transition of Nepal from monarchy to democracy. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), 23(2)(12), 22-27. https://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jhss/papers/Vol.%2023%20Issue2/Version-12/B2302122227.pdf

Keohane, R. O. (1980). The theory of hegemonic stability and changes in international economic regimes, 1967–1977. In O. R. Holsti, R. M. Siverson, & A. George (Eds.), Change in the international system (pp. 131–162). Westview Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429052187-6

Keohane, R. O. (1984). After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton University Press. https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691122489/

Khaliq, S. (2017). The post 9-11 US foreign policy towards south Asia: Political and ideological challenges. South Asian Survey, 24(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971523117753759

Kharel, J. (2024). Realist and liberal perspectives: A critical analysis of the millennium challenge corporation (MCC) in Nepal. Journal of National Development, 37(1), 14-34. https://doi.org/10.62047/JND.2024.06.30.14

Kindleberger, C. P. (1973). The world in depression, 1929–1939. University of California Press. https://www.ucpress.edu/books/the-world-in-depression-1929-1939/paper

Kindleberger, C. P. (1981). Dominance and leadership in the international economy: Exploitation, public goods, and free rides. International Studies Quarterly, 25(2), 242–254. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600355

Kofroth, T. (2023, September 30). Six decades of Peace Corps in Nepal. The Kathmandu Post. https://kathmandupost.com/columns/2023/09/30/celebrating-us-nepal-bond-through-peace-corps

Koirala, K. R. (2023, July 15). US Assistant Secy Lu concludes his whirlwind trip to Nepal, focusing on MCC projects, strengthening bilateral relations. MyRepublica. Kathmandu, Nepal. https://myrepublica.nagariknetwork.com/news/us-assistant-secretary-of-state-lu-concludes-his-whirlwind-trip-to-nepal-focusing-on-mcc-projects-and-strengthening-bilateral-relations

Kramer, M. (2006). Great-power rivalries, Tibetan guerrilla resistance, and the Cold War in South Asia: Introduction. Journal of Cold War Studies, 8(3), 5-14. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/201238 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236812468_Great-Power_R

Krasner, S. D. (Ed.). (1983). International regimes. Cornell University Press.

Kreuttner, T. R. (2009). The Maoist insurgency in Nepal, 1996-2008: Implications for US counter insurgency doctrine. Biblioscholar. https://www.amazon.com/Maoist-Insurgency-Nepal-1996-2008-Counterinsurgency/dp/1288288247

Langat, J. C. (2024). Analysis of land use change dynamics of tibetan refugee settlements in Karnataka, India (Master›s thesis, Northern Arizona University). https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/9/1572

Lawoti, M., & Pahari, A. (Eds.) (2010). The Maoist insurgency in Nepal: Evolution and growth of the Maoist insurgency in Nepal. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/The-Maoist-Insurgency-in-Nepal-Revolution-in-the-Twenty-first-Century/Lawoti-Pahari/p/book/9780415809948

Lepcha, N., & Paul, S. (2020). Peace Corps and its contribution towards the sustainable development goals. In J. C. Gill, & M. Smith (Eds.), Peace, justice and strong institutions (pp. 1-9). Springer International Publishing.

Mage, J. (2007). The Nepali Revolution and International Relations. Economic and Political Weekly, 42(20), 1834–1839. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4419603kindle

Miklian, J. (2008). International media’s role on US–small state relations: The case of Nepal. Foreign Policy Analysis, 4(4), 399-418. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24909863

Millennium Challenge Account Nepal. (2021, December 13). Serious objection to the systematic dissemination of misleading content against MCA-Nepal (Press Release). https://www.mcanp.org/Content/GetPdf?filePath=%2FMCANP%2FPressRelease%2FPress-Release-MCA-Nepal-concerns-on-fake-documents.pdf&section=PressRelease&guid=2a84a3fe-1223-4654-8802-e1f0168bbe93

Millennium Challenge Corporation. (2015, February 20). Readout of MCC CEO’s trip to Nepal [Press release]. Millennium Challenge Corporation. https://www.mcc.gov/news-and-events/release/release-022014-readout-of-mcc/

Millennium Challenge Corporation. (2017). Millennium Challenge Corporation Nepal Compact. https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/23-830-Nepal-Foreign-Assistance-MCC-9.14.2017-TIMS-59069.pdf

Millennium Challenge Corporation. (2021, September 8). Clarification letter and responses: English and Nepali. U.S. Embassy in Nepal. https://uploads.mwp.mprod.getusinfo.com/uploads/sites/27/2021/09/MCC-Clarification-Letter-and-Responses-English-and-Nepali.pdf

Millennium Challenge Corporation. (2022, March 1). MCC statement on Nepal Compact ratification [Press release]. https://www.mcc.gov/news-and-events/release/stmt-030122-nepal-compact-ratification/

Millennium Challenge Corporation. (n.d.). Nepal Compact. Retrieved May, 2025 from https://www.mcc.gov/where-we-work/program/nepal-compact

Muraviev, A. D., Ahlawat, D., & Hughes, L. (2021). India’s security dilemma: Engaging big powers while retaining strategic autonomy. International Politics 59, 1119–1138. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-021-00350-z

Nayak, N. (2007). The Maoist movement in Nepal and its tactical digressions: A study of strategic revolutionary phases, and future implications. Strategic Analysis, 31(6), 915-942. https://doi.org/10.1080/09700160701740488

Nayak, N. (2008). Involvement of major powers in Nepal since the 1990s: Implications for India. Strategic Analysis, 33(1), 41-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/09700160802518551

Nayak, N. R. (2014). Intensifying India-China Rivalry and its Implications for Nepal. Gaida’s Dance with Tiger and Dragon, 131-148. FriedrichEbertStiftung Nepal Office. https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/nepal/18700-20220124.pdf

Nepal, R. (2021). Nepal worldview: Foreign policy and diplomacy. Journal of Foreign Affairs, 1(1), 219-237. https://doi.org/10.3126/jofa.v1i1.36259

Norris, J. (2005, February 9). Nepal presents test case for Bush doctrine. Arab News. https://www.arabnews.com/node/262129

Nye, J. S. (2004a). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. PublicAffairs. https://www.wcfia.harvard.edu/publications/soft-power-means-success-world-politics

Nye, J. S., Jr. (2004b). Soft power and American foreign policy. Political Science Quarterly, 119(2), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.2307/20202345

Pandey, K. P. (2020). The proposed Nepal-China trans-border railway in Nepal’s collective imagination. The South Asianist Journal, 7, 82-97. https://www.southasianist.ed.ac.uk/southasianist/article/view/4203

Pandey, N. N. (2024). Nepal and Bhutan: The United States returns to the Himalayas. In C. R, Mohan (Ed.), Biden and beyond: The United States rethinks South Asia (pp. 97-112). https://doi.org/10.1142/13412

Pandey, R. (2015). kūṭanīti ra rājanīti [Diplomacy and politics]. Sangrila-La Books.

Pathak, B. (2022). The Nepal Compact. Cook Communication. https://www.lulu.com/shop/bishnu-pathak-phd/the-nepal-compact/paperback/product-4wrm6v.htm

Paudyal, M. & Dhungana, S. (2022, January 2). Dr Bhekh Bahadur Thapa looks back at Nepal’s foreign policy trajectory. Nepal Live Today. https://www.nepallivetoday.com/2022/01/02/dr-bhekh-bahadur-thapa-looks-back-at-nepals-foreign-policy-trajectory

Pokharel, A. P. (2024). Navigating the complexities of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) in Nepal. Academia Research Journal, 3(2), 24-34. https://doi.org/10.3126/academia.v3i2.67367

Poudel, K. (2017, June 5). Nepal Army mission diplomacy. Spotlight Nepal. https://www.spotlightnepal.com/2017/06/05/nepal-army-mission-diplomacy

Ranjit, S. R. (2023). The Peacebuilding Process in Nepal and the End of the Insurgency (Master’s Thesis, Naval Postgraduate School). https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/html/trecms/AD1212989/

Rid, T., & Buchanan, B. (2015). Attributing cyber attacks. Journal of Strategic Studies, 38(1–2), 4–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2014.977382

Rijal, B. (Ed.) (2019). nēpālakō kūṭanītika abhyāsaḥ rājadūtaharūkō anubhava [Diplomatic Practice of Nepal: Experiences of Diplomats]. Institute of Foreign Affairs.

Røren, P. (2024). Unipolarity is not over yet. Global Studies Quarterly, 4, Article ksae018. https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksae018

Sapkota, R. (2020). Nepal’s Conundrum in the Indo-Pacific amidst the emergence of the great power rivalry. Stosunki Międzynarodowe – International Relations, 56(2), 111-124. https://doi.org/10.7366/020909612202006

Shah, S. (2008). Civil society in uncivil places: soft state and regime change in Nepal. East-West Center. https://bookshop.iseas.edu.sg/publication/1353

Shah, A., & Karki, S. (2023). Examining the systemic realities of India in the US-backed Indo-Pacific Strategy. Stosunki Międzynarodowe–International Relations, 3(6). https://internationalrelations-publishing.org/articles/3-6/v1

Shahi, P. (2025, March 12). In Nepal, US pulls the plug on aid projects worth Rs 46.12 billion. The Kathmandu Post. https://kathmandupost.com/national/2025/03/12/in-nepal-us-pulls-the-plug-on-aid-projects-worth-rs46-12-billion

Shrestha, B. P. (1988). Prospect of economic cooperation in South Asia. Economic Journal of Nepal, 11(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.3126/ejon.v11i1.70952

Shrestha, P. M., & Giri, A. (2021, September 9). MCC responds to Nepal’s concerns ahead of its top officials’ arrival. The Kathmandu Post. https://kathmandupost.com/national/2021/09/09/a-day-after-responding-to-nepal-s-concerns-mcc-officials-arrive-in-kathmandu

Shrestha, S. (2022). Media framing and geopolitical influence: The MCC debate in Nepal. Journal of International Affairs and Development, 5(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.47604/jir.2599

Smith, E. C., & Khanal, K. (2019). Nepal-US relations post 1950. In P. Jaiswal (Ed.), Nepal and Great Powers, (pp. 50-69). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344000063_Nepal-US_Relations_Post_1950

Snidal, D. (1985). The limits of hegemonic stability theory. International Organization, 39(4), 579–614. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706716

Sobolik, M. S. (2024). Countering China’s great game: A strategy for American dominance. Naval Institute Press. https://www.usni.org/press/books/countering-chinas-great-game

State Department. (2022, June 28). U.S. relations with Nepal. https://2021-2025.state.gov/u-s-relations-with-nepal/

Strange, S. (1987). The persistent myth of lost hegemony. International Organization, 41(4), 551–574. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706758

Thapa, D. (Ed.). (2019). The politics of change: Reflections on contemporary Nepal. Social Science Baha & The Asia Foundation. Himal Books. https://asiafoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/The-Politics-of-Change_Reflections-on-Contemporary-Nepal_Thapa.pdf

Thapa, H. B. (2019, September 27). Highway and geopolitics. The Annapurna Express. https://theannapurnaexpress.com/story/16945/

Thapa, S. P. (2014). Struggle of Tibet: from armed conflict to non-violence (Master›s thesis, Norwegian University of Life Sciences). http://hdl.handle.net/11250/225277

Timalsina, S. K. (2024). India’s Maneuvering in Nepal. Khwopa Journal, 6(1), 13-29. https://doi.org/10.3126/kjour.v6i1.66799

Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission. (2019, November 20). TLHRC cochairs lead letter on human rights of Tibetans in Nepal [Press release]. U.S. House Committee on Foreign Affairs. https://humanrightscommission.house.gov/news/press-releases/tlhrc-co-chairs-lead-letter-human-rights-tibetans-nepal

Tsering, D. (2024). Taiwan and the exiled Tibetan relations: exploring historical ties and current challenges and opportunities. Asian Ethnicity, 25(2), 323-339.

U.S. Agency for International Development. (2022, May 5). Nepal and the United States sign new fiveyear development assistance agreement [Press release]. U.S. Embassy Kathmandu. https://np.usembassy.gov/news-05052022

US Census Bureau. (2025). International trade. https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c5360.html?

U.S. Department of State. (2008). Daily press briefing. Tom Casey, Deputy Spokesman. U.S. Department of State Archive. https://2001-2009.state.gov/r/pa/prs/dpb/2008/may/104681.htm

U.S. Department of State. (2021, July 27). Secretary Blinken’s call with Nepali Prime Minister Deuba. https://2021-2025.state.gov/secretary-blinkens-call-with-nepali-prime-minister-deuba-2/

U.S. Embassy in Nepal. (2022, June 17). State partnership program factsheet. https://np.usembassy.gov/state-partnership-program-factsheet

United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (2023, March). Nepal factsheet. UNHCR. https://www.unhcr.org/media/nepal-factsheet

USAID. (2023). Nepal. https://www.usaid.gov/nepal

Varadarajan, S. (2008, April 26). US subverting Nepal poll mandate? United We Blog for a Democratic Nepal. https://blog.com.np/2008/04/26/us-subverting-nepal-poll-mandate/

Vaughn, B. (2008, October). Nepal: political developments and bilateral relations with the United States. Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress. https://sgp.fas.org/crs/row/RL34731.pdf

Vinodan, C., & Kurian, A. L. (2024). Strategic autonomy and India’s hedging policies in the Indo-Pacific. Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, 11(4), 475–495. http://doi.org/10.1177/23477970241282095

Voice of America. (2002, January 19). Powell leaves on South Asia peace mission. VOA News. https://www.voanews.com/a/a-13-a-2002-01-19-9-powell-67247112/378855.html

Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making. Council of Europe. https://edoc.coe.int/en/media/7495-information-disorder-toward-an-interdisciplinary-framework-for-research-and-policy-making.html

Webb, M. C., & Krasner, S. D. (1989). Hegemonic stability theory: An empirical assessment. Review of International Studies, 15(2), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500112999

World Bank. (2025). DataBank. https://databank.worldbank.org/home.aspx

Yuwei, H. (2022, February 25). Looting in name of democracy: How US pulls the strings behind controversial MCC deal with Nepal? Global Times. https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202202/1253166.shtml

Zhou, J. (2023). Great power competition as the new normal of China-US relations. Palgrave Macmillan. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-031-09413-2